7/21/2023 0 Comments Color machineEach circumstance needs to be evaluated individually to determine the appropriateness of color-coding. A situation of where a citation might be issued for lack of color-coding is a machine guard that, while protecting an employee from one hazard, exposes that employee to another hazard, such as a trip hazard or an overhead "struck-by" hazard. During an inspection, if a hazard is present that is related to color-coding or the lack thereof, then OSHA could issue a citation for a violation of 1910.144. The standard specifies that yellow is to be used to identify physical hazards such as striking against, stumbling, falling, and "caught in-between." The idea behind color-coding is to make the employee aware of potentially hazardous conditions. 144, there are specific color-coding requirements for items such as safety cans or other portable containers of flammable liquids and for devices such as emergency stop buttons, switches, and bars, but beyond that, the standard does not specify what machines or portions of machines need to be color-coded. Response: No, the Agency does not cite employers every time for not color-coding a machine or parts of a machine. Question #1: Does your agency cite employers (every time) for not having a machine properly color-coded when they conduct a survey of a machine? If not, could you give me an example of when a citation may be issued on this subject? Your paraphrased inquiries and our responses follow. I apologize for the delay in providing this response. 144 and the color-coding of machines and machine guards in accordance with ANSI Z535.1-1990. This letter constitutes OSHA's interpretation only of the requirements discussed and may not be applicable to any questions not delineated within your original correspondence. Thank you for your Jletter to the Occupational Safety and Health Administration's (OSHA's) Directorate of Enforcement Programs.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |